Vietnam is undergoing rapid digital payment transformation. In 2025, 39.5 million digital payment users generate over $36.7 billion in transaction volume — a 39.03% adoption rate that is rising fast. The market's defining dynamic is the parallel growth of mobile wallets and QR-based bank transfers via the VietQR (Vietnam Quick Response Code) national standard, while COD (Cash on Delivery) remains structurally significant among a large unbanked population.
Vietnam overview
Country | Vietnam |
|---|---|
Population | 102.3 million |
GDP (USD) | $485.0 billion |
Currency | Vietnamese Dong (VND) |
e-Commerce market CAGR (2024–2028) | 7.29% (Statista) |
Digital payment adoption | 39.03% (39.5 million users; Statista 2025) |
Which payment methods do Vietnamese buyers use most?
Digital wallets hold 38% of Vietnam's e-Commerce market, bank transfers 28%, and COD 16%. Together wallets and bank transfers cover 66% of online transaction volume. Vietnam's 2025 payment breakdown:
- Digital wallets — 38%. MoMo, ZaloPay, and ShopeePay are the dominant platforms. Wallet share is projected to hold steady at 38% through 2030, while absolute transaction value grows with the wider market.
- Bank transfers — 28%, projected to reach 35% by 2030. The fastest-growing segment. QR code payment transaction value surged 151% in 2025, alongside the expansion of VietQR, a national interoperable standard connecting participating banks.
- COD — 16%. Above the Asian average. Approximately 44% of Vietnam's population holds no bank account; COD serves as a trust bridge for first-time buyers, particularly in fashion and lower-ticket categories.
- Credit cards — 12%, declining to 10% by 2030. NAPAS, Visa, and Mastercard are the primary schemes. More relevant for international shoppers and higher-income urban buyers than mass-market domestic checkout.
- Debit cards — 4%. Primarily used for ATM withdrawals rather than online checkout, limiting e-Commerce relevance.
Vietnam e-Commerce payment method share (2025)
How MoMo, VietQR, and COD work for merchants in Vietnam
Vietnam's three dominant rails — wallets, VietQR bank transfers, and COD — each carry distinct integration requirements, settlement rules, and conversion implications that affect how merchants configure and sequence their checkout. The table below covers key platforms and the operational facts specific to each method.
MoMo and ZaloPay combine payments with other consumer services, while VietQR provides an interoperable QR standard across participating banks. For merchants deciding how to structure checkout slot priority across Vietnam's three dominant rails, the mix of wallet, bank transfer, and COD requires distinct placement logic.
Payment method | Key platforms | Approx. share | What merchants should know |
|---|---|---|---|
Digital wallets | MoMo, ZaloPay, ShopeePay | ~38% | Major local wallets provide mobile-first checkout for Vietnamese buyers. |
Bank transfers | VietQR-linked banks | ~28% | VietQR is a national interoperable standard — one QR code connects all participating banks; no per-bank integration required. |
COD | GHN, GHTK | ~16% | Merchants need to account for delivery refusal, returns, and slower cash collection. |
Credit cards | NAPAS, Visa, Mastercard | ~12% | Cross-border transactions require SBV (State Bank of Vietnam) compliance, which affects which payment gateways are eligible. |
Debit cards | NAPAS | ~4% | A smaller e-Commerce category than wallets, bank transfers, COD, and credit cards. |
Payment method trends in Vietnam: 2025 to 2030
Bank transfers are the standout growth story, projected to rise from 28% to 35% by 2030 as VietQR adoption and digital infrastructure expand. COD declines from 16% to 12% as the unbanked population shrinks. Wallet share holds flat at 38% in percentage terms as absolute volume grows with the market. For sequencing MoMo and VietQR in a Vietnam checkout, see the e-Commerce checkout optimization guide for multi-rail checkout configuration in markets where wallet and bank transfer share is closely matched.
Vietnam e-Commerce payment methods: 2025 vs 2030 projection
